How about all this snow! It's crazy.
I watched a documentary on PBS last night called Extreme Ice. It was very cool (hah! I kill myself). You can watch it on the PBS website. Basically, it is a persuasive piece on what appears to be a rapid global ice melt. I have no reliable resources to turn to when it comes to scientific facts on global warming. Do you? The documentary was well done and fun to watch--countless scenes of massive chunks of glaciers "calving" into the deep blue, beautifully deep-carved turquoise canyons in the ice caps of Greenland, and time-lapsed filming of the rapid recession of enormous mountain glaciers. The message I got: this world is breathtakingly beautiful. The message intended (I think): we better stop burning fossil fuels or else!
Why is all this global warming talk such a big deal? I'll tell you why it's a big deal to me. Isn't it strange that a career politician, Al Gore, was the one to ultimately bring the discussion of global warming to the fore? Shouldn't that have been some suave PhD from Harvard (a Robert Langdon type) that has spent his life work on understanding the complicated patterns of global climate? If there's one thing I have come to believe about career politicians, it's that they don't spend much time on things that do not promote their own career. "An Inconvenient Truth" was a political move. From what I have observed, the Left generally likes to use global warming (now called "climate change" for reasons discussed below) as evidence that the government needs to coerce us (by legislation) into being more responsible sons and daughters of mother earth. And the Right tends to point out that there is no evidence that global warming is human caused, "so keep your big government ideas out of our private lives!" You must already know to which side I lean.
On Sunday, I was watching Fox News Sunday with Chris Wallace. The discussion they had on global warming was a classic back and forth by the Left and Right. Here's one place to read the transcript. The discussion starts with "WALLACE: Senator James Inhofe, a leading opponent of climate change legislation..." You'll find it about halfway down the transcript. If you use the "ctrl f" hot key and type in "senator james", you'll find it right away.
I just read it again. Ooooh it just gets my blood boiling! Connoly and Williams provide the classic liberal arguments that we should go green. It's so slimy how the rhetoric of the debate slowly changes with them. This was the first time I ever heard or read anyone say something like "human-exacerbated climate change." It kind of softens the blow from just flat out saying "human-caused" or "man-made." Maybe a half-truth? With all the debacle going on in the UN panel on climate change, the Left has to admit that global warming has been overstated without sufficient evidence.
How about the part on energy independence? Duh! Just drill! We've got enough oil, shale and natural gas under our feet to last a couple millenia! We can do it without ruining our beautiful planet. I love how Kristol points out that it is much more morally defensible that fossil fuels be used to empower the impoverished nations toward the improvement of the lives of their people than to cut them off from such resources in the name of environmentalism.
And the kicker... "Connoly: And it's difficult for the human mind to deal with counterintuitive notions." (Referring to all the snow we've gotten in the face of global warming). My translation of Connoly: I'm so much smarter than all you dumb conservatives out there. Can you "wrap your head around it." Oh please! You know, there's nothing quite so distasteful about the Left than their outright arrogance. It's a communal superiority complex. For the whole two minutes I could stand watching Bill Maher on Larry King live the other night he managed to belittle everyone watching the show with this blanket statement: "what the Democrats never understand is that Americans don't really care what position you take, just stick with one. Just be strong. They're not bright enough to really understand the issues. But like an animal, they can sort of sense strength or weakness. They can smell it on you." Apparently he is "bright enough."
Seriously?
This is all I have to say: I will never drive a Pious, eh-hem, I mean, Prius. Not as long as I have a choice in the matter.
Wednesday, February 17, 2010
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
AMEN!!! I totally agree on every point!
ReplyDeleteThough, I do believe that we can and should do more to take care of mother earth, I don't believe the government needs to push legislation to make us. Nor do I think that Al Gore was/is/or ever will be qualified to tell us "An Inconvenient Truth" about anything...well, unless it's convenient for HIM and his political agenda. AND for his convenience he'll fly in his private fuel burning/guzzling jet to "educate" us all.
In our house we blame everything on "climate change" just like the LEFT does. I was two weeks late and not pregnant = "Oh that dang climate change!" (Sorry too much information?)
I can not lie, I may, in the future buy a hybrid just to cut MY fuel COSTS. But only if they make a hybrid Mini-van. I'm pretty sure that will be the direction of our next vehicle purchase. I can't wait for the room and the higher view point!
I TOTALLY agree about how arrogant the LEFT is...and they have Senators jumping ship because of it...the ones NOT living in a perpetual Fantasyland are the ones jumping. Comparing human beings to animals who have no sense of right and wrong is insulting and down right...arrogant!
Jason, you better be careful or you are going to bust a blood vessel.
ReplyDeleteWhile it's true enough that politicians generally have an agenda, the scientific community is generally know for sticking to the facts as they currently understand them. So maybe I don't have reason to believe Gore. What reason to I have not to believe National Geographic? http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2004/12/1206_041206_global_warming.html
ReplyDeleteor Scientific American http://www.scientificamerican.com/podcast/episode.cfm?id=what-does-winter-weather-reveal-abo-10-02-11
Even if you don't believe that man is the cause, what is the harm in adopting new technology that can cut your costs and are totally renewable? Even if the reserves can last 2000 years, why not cut back and try to make it last 3000 years? Not to mention that less pollution will probably lead to better health for all in the long run.
I have a use for all the dead hybrid batteries - they'll be used as Lego building blocks for the Legolands of the future. Oh that's right, there's corrosive acids in those, aren't there? - maybe not a good idea after all.
ReplyDeleteI shouldn't sound so harsh - I think I would drive one but Greg is opposed, he's afraid I'd be smooshed by Al Gore in his Cadillac (if he still has one) - and the CPA in him says it would need to make economic sense for the extra cost for us to by a hybrid.
I don't understand why we let ourselves get caught up in this being a political issue. To me, this is not political but humanitarian.
ReplyDeleteI agree with Kimberly. What is the harm in preservation? Why would we not do whatever we can to care for the world around us? In whatever capacity is in our power.
By making this a political issue, we shut ourselves off from having an open and honest conversation.
Yes, the "left" can be over the top and arrogant.
Yes, the "right" can be provincial and stubborn.
Why align yourself with either? Educate yourself, take action based on your own findings and do it with an open mind.
We all believe in things that cannot be proven or seen. In all honesty, I think many of those things are much less probable than global climate change. But the whole of those beliefs lead to a good, responsible and in many ways enlightened lifestyle. Which, as a side note, can be seen as arrogant by some.
I am a "follow your gut" kinda girl and my gut says: RECYCLE!
I love it! All great responses. Please, keep them coming.
ReplyDeleteAn interesting discussion about finding unbiased science:
ReplyDeletehttp://www.sciencefriday.com/program/archives/201002191